Legal Opinion

United States v. Ben Gholston

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 6, 1991No. 89-7326PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Defendant Ben Gholston brings this appeal from his conviction on a two-count indictment charging him with assault on a federal official and committing such an assault with a dangerous weapon under 18 U.S.C. § 111. Claiming that there are no nonfrivolous grounds for appeal, counsel for Gholston has moved to withdraw after filing a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Upon the filing of an Anders brief, a reviewing court is required to conduct a full examination of the record to decide whether the case is wholly frivolous and, only after…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. Harry Stephens, Jr. And Claude Lee HooperCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Daryl O. McCleese v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. Tony Jerome MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Ronnie DukeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. Eddie Andrew GordonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API