City of St. Joseph v. Kaw Valley Tunneling, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
NUGENT, Judge.
The city of St. Joseph appeals from an order granting respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment on a cross claim for indemnity based on a judgment rendered against both parties in an earlier proceeding.
Rule 74.04(c) 1 permits the entry of summary judgment when it is shown “that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Thus, on reviewing the grant of a motion for summary judgment, our duty is to scrutinize the record in the light most favorable to the party against whom the motion was filed and to accord such…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Oates v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
- Crab Orchard Improvement Co. v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
- Kirst v. Clarkson Construction CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Barkley v. Carter County State BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Richardson Associates v. Lincoln-Devore, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- Sunshine Realty Corp. v. KillianMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Global Petromarine v. G.T. Sales & Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Denny's Inc. v. Avesta Enterprises, Ltd.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.