Legal Opinion

Genth v. Gardner

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 17, 1928No. 12,018Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler

Sebastian Gardner, the defendant in error, obtained, as plaintiff below, a judgment requiring May P. Genth,. the plaintiff in error, to convey and transfer to Gardner an undivided one-half interest in certain land, improvements and personal property.

The complaint sets forth, in substance, the following facts: The plaintiff and the defendant entered into a “joint undertaking” — the word agreement is studiously avoided — “for the purpose of acquiring, owning, maintaining and operating a tourist and fishing resort on Spring Creek, in Gunnison county, Colorado.” Between December 7, 1917, and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CarkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Pacific Livestock Co. v. GentryOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Clark v. BayleyOregon Supreme Court · 1874
  4. In re Estate of GroomeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Shorman v. EakinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API