Genth v. Gardner
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler
Sebastian Gardner, the defendant in error, obtained, as plaintiff below, a judgment requiring May P. Genth,. the plaintiff in error, to convey and transfer to Gardner an undivided one-half interest in certain land, improvements and personal property.
The complaint sets forth, in substance, the following facts: The plaintiff and the defendant entered into a “joint undertaking” — the word agreement is studiously avoided — “for the purpose of acquiring, owning, maintaining and operating a tourist and fishing resort on Spring Creek, in Gunnison county, Colorado.” Between December 7, 1917, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. CarkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Pacific Livestock Co. v. GentryOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- Clark v. BayleyOregon Supreme Court · 1874
- In re Estate of GroomeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Shorman v. EakinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.