Barrett v. Crary
District Court, D. Alaska
This matter is now before the court upon a motion to make •the complaint more definite and certain. The motion goes to several of the allegations of the complaint; the only one of which was urged by the defendant upon brief and argument is that asking that the complaint more definitely describe the lode claims, for the recovery of which suit is brought.
Read the full summary
This matter is now before the court upon a motion to make •the complaint more definite and certain. The motion goes to several of the allegations of the complaint; the only one of which was urged by the defendant upon brief and argument is that asking that the complaint more definitely describe the lode claims, for the recovery of which suit is brought. The property, as described in the complaint, is: “Those certain lode mining claims, lying, being and situate near the head of Porcupine creek, a branch of the Kuskulina river, in the recording precinct of Chitina, in the district of Alaska,…
1Opinion of the Court
CUSHMAN, District Judge.
Defendant’s counsel rely in support of their motion upon the following authorities: Tracy v. Harmon, 17 Mont. 465, 43 Pac. 500; Lindley on Mines, vol. 1, § 379, p. 694; Darger et al. v. Le Sieur, 8 Utah, 160, 30 Pac. 363; Darger et al. v. Le Sieur, 9 Utah, 192, 33 Pac. 701; Glacier Mt. Silver Min. Co. v. J. Frank Willis et al., 127 U. S. 480, 8 Sup. Ct. 1217, 32 L. Ed. 172.
Plaintiffs’ counsel rely upon the following authorities: Glacier Mt. Silver Min. Co. v. J. Frank Willis et al., 127 U. S. 480, 8 Sup. Ct. 1217, 32 L. Ed. 172; Colorado Central Consolidated Min. Co.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Beard v. FederySupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Glacier Mountain Silver Mining Co. v. WillisSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Darger v. Le SieurUtah Supreme Court · 1892
- Tracy v. HarmonMontana Supreme Court · 1896
- Castro v. GillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Griffith v. HanfordOregon Supreme Court · 1942