Legal Opinion
Martin v. Stites
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided May 16, 2002No. Civil Action 98-2226-GTVPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VanBEBBER, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiffs, tow truck operators in Linn County, Kansas, bring this suit against the Linn County Sheriff and Board of County Commissioners, alleging antitrust and constitutional claims arising out of the methods used by the sheriff to' refer tow calls. The sheriffs department refers tow calls to county tow truck operators when a vehicle on a highway or other public property requires the services of a tow truck and the driver is unavailable or has no preference as to which tow company to call. Such tow calls are known as “nonpreference…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Clinic for Women, Inc. v. BrizziIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. v. Kansas Department of TransportationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2013
- Duck Tours Seafari, Inc. v. City of Key WestDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Clinic for Women, Inc. v. BrizziIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- House v. National Park ServiceDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2024