Legal Opinion
State v. Northrop
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided March 23, 1936No. File #8322PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCornell, J.
The information counts on Supplement to Connecticut General Statutes, d±1707C.
This provides insofar as is material here, as follows:
“Any person who shall keep .... a slot machine which is used for the purpose of gaming or designed for the purpose of a lottery or gaming, or which is used or designed to discharge with or without merchandise any tokens which may be used for further operation of a slot machine or for exchange, or which is used or designed to display any symbol entitling any person by reasion of such display to receive merchandise or money, shall be fined.” .... etc.
The State…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Adams v. AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- State v. VasquezSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
- State v. Mint Vending MacHine No. 195084Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
- Sparks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Fey v. Rossi Improvement CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Connecticut v. MOODY'S CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- Skerritt v. Sandoz Nutrition Corporation, No. 305253 (Jun. 28, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991
- Carothers, Commissioner v. Radwilowicz, No. 37 32 66 (Jun. 6, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991
- Ferguson v. Ebi Medical Systems, No. 527663 (Aug. 1, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995