Legal Opinion
Connecticut v. MOODY'S CORPORATION
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 30, 2009No. Civ. 3:08CV1314(AWT), 3:08CV1315(AWT), 3:08CV1316(AWT)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTIONS TO REMAND
ALVIN W. THOMPSON, District Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
The State of Connecticut (the “State”) filed separate actions, which are the same in all material respects for the purposes of the instant motions, against Moody’s Corporation (“Moody’s”), Fitch, Inc. (“Fitch”), and the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (“McGraw-Hill”) in Connecticut Superior Court, seeking redress for the defendants’ alleged “unfair, deceptive and illegal business practice of systematically and intentionally giving lower credit ratings to bonds issued by states, municipalities, and other public entities as…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Standard & Poor's Rating Agency LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Connecticut v. Sandoz, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2024