Legal Opinion
Continental Insurance Co. of New York v. Hall
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 27, 1943No. 30777PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
This is an action to recover on a fire insurance policy. The principal question is whether at the time of the loss the policy was suspended by reason of a failure to pay in full an installment due on a promissory note given for the premium.
The policy was issued by the Continental Insurance Company of New York on the 18th of July, 1933. The expiration date was five years later, July 18, 1938. It was for the sum of $1,000 and intended to protect Beulah Hall against loss by fire, and other contingencies not herein important, of a dwelling house located on a designated section of land in Beaver…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gish v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
- Nebraska & Iowa Ins. v. ChristiensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
- Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of California v. McDowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Continental Insurance v. PortwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- St. Paul Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Allied Steel Construction Co. v. Employers Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Community National Life Insurance Co. v. GrahamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- First National Bank of Porter v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Bankers Security Life Insurance Co. v. TownsendSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- The Catts Company, an Oklahoma Corporation v. Gulf Insurance Company, a Foreign Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.