Legal Opinion

Shelter v. Grobsmith

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHinkley, J.

This is a motion by plaintiff to strike out the second and third defenses of the answer of the defendant Martin Erickson. The answer admits that the plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile driven by the answering defendant, Martin Erickson, at the time of its collision with an automobile owned by the other defendants. The second and third defenses allege that plaintiff and the answering defendant, Martin Erickson, were both employees of the one employer, Brunswick Balke Collender Company, not a party to this action; that plaintiff was employed in one of the hazardous employments enumerated…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Judson v. FieldingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  2. Caldana v. BuezenburgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cohalan v. New York World-Telegram Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API