Caldana v. Buezenburg
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Hubbs, P. J.:
The complaint in the second above-entitled action alleges that the defendant Buezenburg was engaged in farming and that the defendant Burnham was his employee engaged in such business; that the plaintiff was in the employ of the defendant Buezenburg as a picker and farm hand; that she was injured solely through the negligence of the defendants. The separate answer of each defendant alleges “ that the plaintiff at the time of her alleged injuries was in the employ of the partnership of Buezenburg and Taft in the farming-operations of the said partnership at North Collins, New…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Peet v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Rugg v. Norwich Hospital Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Brockett v. MietzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
3Cited by4 opinions
- Thompson v. KiesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Lamar v. CollinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1929
- Fostner v. MorawitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Shelter v. GrobsmithNew York Supreme Court · 1932