Legal Opinion

Lumas Film Corp. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 21, 1928No. Docket No. 5868PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

The facts in this matter appear to be that the petitioner herein is a foreign corporation; that in an action brought against it in this state an alleged service of summons was made in accordance with the provisions of subdivision 2 of section 411 of the Code of Civil Procedure; that thereupon the defendant made a motion to quash the service of summons, which resulted in the denial of said motion. Thereafter petitioner presented to this court its petition for a writ of prohibition to be directed to the lower court, restraining it from taking further proceedings in the action. An alternative…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ex parte OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Pennsylvania R. R. v. RogersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Agassiz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Murphy v. Superior Court of Santa Clara CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Finley v. MooseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jardine v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Bullard v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Fels v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Mills Music, Inc. v. LamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. August Belmont & Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API