Lumas Film Corp. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.
The facts in this matter appear to be that the petitioner herein is a foreign corporation; that in an action brought against it in this state an alleged service of summons was made in accordance with the provisions of subdivision 2 of section 411 of the Code of Civil Procedure; that thereupon the defendant made a motion to quash the service of summons, which resulted in the denial of said motion. Thereafter petitioner presented to this court its petition for a writ of prohibition to be directed to the lower court, restraining it from taking further proceedings in the action. An alternative…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ex parte OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Pennsylvania R. R. v. RogersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
- Agassiz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Murphy v. Superior Court of Santa Clara CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Finley v. MooseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jardine v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Bullard v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Fels v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Mills Music, Inc. v. LamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- August Belmont & Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931