People v. Doyle
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtConway, J.
The defendant is forty-nine years of age and has taught in schools for boys for twenty-five years. He was convicted of the crime of sodomy. There was no proof of the commission of the crime except as it came from the words of the complainant. The jury was charged by the County Judge that if it found that the complainant was an accomplice, it must find corroboration before it could convict him. That was the law of the case. We have recently pointed out that the corroborative evidence of the testimony of an accomplice “ must be evidence *122from an independent source of some material fact tending…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. MullensNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- People v. FeoloNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- People v. LazarNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. JamesNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. WatsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- People v. LevyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- People v. DunbarNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1954
- People v. RootAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.