Legal Opinion

Nathan Sinko v. State of Mississippi

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided April 12, 2016No. 2015-CA-00107-COAPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, J.,

for the Court:

¶1. In. May 2012, Nathan Sinko pled guilty to manufacturing and possessing methamphetamine. Under the statutes in effect at the time of Sinko’s plea and sentencing, his conviction for manufacturing a controlled substance other than marijuana rendered him ineligible for parole. ■ Indeed, this Court made this point clear in McGovern v. Miss. Department of Corrections, 89 So.3d 69 (Miss.Ct.App.2011)., Nonetheless, for reasons that have not been explained, prior to and continuing well after McGovern, the Mississippi Department of Corrections (MDOC) classified Sinko and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hassett v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Gilmer v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Fordice v. BryanMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Verenzo Cartrell Green v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2016
  5. New York Ex Rel. New York State Office of Children & Family Services v. United States Department of Health & Human Services' Administration for Children & FamiliesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Linda Fay Barnett-Phillips v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016
  2. Franklin Ray Odom v. Mississippi Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016
  3. MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS v. Benjamin COOKMississippi Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Wallace Wayne Whatley v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017
  5. Dennis Lawrence Smith v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API