Legal Opinion

Dobson v. . Simonton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1882PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Civil Action heard on exceptions to a referee’s report at Fall Term, 1881, of Ieedell Superior Court, befere Seymour, J. The plaintiffs appealed. See Bank v. Simonton, ante, 187.

1Opinion of the CourtSjiith, C. J.

The referee in his report, to whose findings of fact there is no exception, those filed by the plaintiffs in the court below being withdrawn in the argument before us, states, as his conclusions drawn from the evidence, that no books for receiving subscriptions to the capital stock of the Bank of Statesville were opened, as directed in the charter, under the supervision of the persons therein named, on the day mentioned, or at any other time, and no money was ever paid, or agreed to be paid under the memorandum prepared by direction of R. F. Simonton, to which his and four other names are…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Henry J. Heryey & Co. v. EdmundsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
  2. Vonglahn v. . DerossetSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  3. Graham v. . TateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  4. Wordsworth v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  5. Long v. Bank of YanceyvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. Lloyd Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  2. Bradley v. ReppellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  3. Marshall Foundry Co. v. . KillianSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  4. Venable Bros. v. Southern Granite Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  5. Heggie v. . Building and Loan AssociationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API