Legal Opinion
Cleveland v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
Decided October 29, 2010No. A-10236PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOLGER, Judge.
Steven Cleveland appeals the dismissal of his application for post-conviction relief, arguing that the statute of limitations that applied to his application was extended because he had filed a motion to correct an illegal sentence before the appeal from his conviction was concluded. We conclude that the statute of limitations was not extended by the pendency of Cleveland's motion to correct an illegal sentence. We also conclude that the superior court did not commit plain error by failing to consider issues that Cleveland did not raise in the court below, including the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Willie Lee Miles v. K.W. Prunty, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Sergey Spitsyn v. Robert Moore, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. DeShongAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. State, Department of Environmental ConservationAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wilkerson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2012
- Xavier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2012
- Cleveland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2010
- Tessa Michael Hillyer v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2023