Sherrill v. Amerada Hess Corp.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GREENE, Judge.
Anna Mae Sherrill et al. and Grover Bob Cloninger et al. (collectively, Plaintiffs) appeal from the trial court’s order restricting the speech of all parties and counsel relating to matters of the cases. 1
Plaintiffs are residents and homeowners in the community of Paw Creek, outside of Charlotte, North Carolina. Amerada Hess Corp. et al. (collectively, Defendants) operate a bulk petroleum storage facility in Paw Creek. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants caused leaks, spills, and emissions of petroleum product to the atmosphere, ground, and groundwater. Plaintiffs further allege…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. v. ConradSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- New York Times Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Gulf Oil Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sharpe v. WorlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- Boyce & Isley, PLLC v. CooperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Priest v. SobeckCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Neill Grading & Construction Co. v. LingafeltCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Hamby v. Profile Products, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.