Legal Opinion

Cronin v. Gramercy Five Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 26, 1996PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Lobis, J.), entered on or about November 17, 1995, which, inter alia, prohibited defendants from inquiring into plaintiff Shea’s past history of drug and alcohol abuse, affirmed, without costs.

The grant or denial of discovery is a discretionary matter (Brady v Ottaway Newspapers, 63 NY2d 1031). Here, the motion court’s ruling was neither beyond the scope of its power to shape the contours of discovery nor an improvident exercise of its discretion. There was no showing of any relationship between the emotional distress that plaintiff claims resulted…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brady v. Ottaway Newspapers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Wachtman v. Trocaire CollegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Alford v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. L.S. v. HaroucheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Alford v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. Anonymous 1 v. New York Blood Center, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Anonymous v. New York Blood Center, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API