Legal Opinion

National City Bank v. Waggoner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 23, 1930PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherman, J.

Defendant Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company (hereinafter teimed Central Bank) has attacked the sufficiency of the complaint as against it. Assuming, as we must, upon this motion in advance of trial, the truth of the allegations of the complaint, the following pleaded facts are before us, which, however, are not substantiated by proof and must await trial for their actual establishment, viz.:

Six banks which are plaintiffs paid in this city to the Chase National Bank on August 31, 1929, an aggregate sum of $500,000, to the credit of the Bank of Telluride, a small State banking institution…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Van Alen v. . American National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Holmes v. . GilmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Newton v. . PorterNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Albany County Bank v. People's Co-operative Ice Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  5. Craig v. Commissioners of the Sinking FundAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Seattle First National Bank v. CrosbyWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. In re the Estate of WoolfsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  3. Parker v. American Surety Co.New York Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Weisinger v. BerfondNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Silverstein v. Continental Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API