Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. Vision Correction Group, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 20, 2003No. A03A0608PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

Following a grant of summary judgment to Vision Correction Group, Inc. (“VCG”), Mary Rodriguez appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in finding that no questions of fact remain regarding her claim of quantum meruit and unjust enrichment in this action for back wages arising out of an employment dispute. Because the undisputed evidence shows that Rodriguez is not entitled to back wages and was reasonably compensated for her services, we affirm.

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. E. D. Lacey Mills, Inc. v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  2. Nelson & Hill, P.A. v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  3. Jackson v. FordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  4. Kaylor v. AtwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. Dover v. MathisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stoker v. BELLEMEADE, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  2. Mark Vernon v. Assurance Forensic Accounting, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  3. Fay v. Custom One Homes, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. McClesky v. VERICON RESOURCES, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  5. Walker Electric Co. v. ByrdCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API