Legal Opinion
Citizens for an Orderly Energy Policy, Inc. v. County of Suffolk
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 18, 1985No. CV-83-4966PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ALTIMARI, District Judge.
The present controversy centers around the County of Suffolk’s lack of participation in off-site radiological emergency evacuation planning for the Long Island Lighting Company’s (“LILCO”) Shoreham Nuclear Power Facility (“Shoreham”), an 809 megawatt nuclear powered electric generating facility located on Long Island’s north shore in the County of Suffolk (the “County”). LILCO and its supporters contend that the County’s actions may result in the denial of an operating license for Shoreham and spell financial doom and bankruptcy for the company.…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Western Air Lines, Inc. v. Port Authority of New York and New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Skull Valley Band of Goshute Indians v. Nielson Ex Rel. Utah Department of Environmental QualityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Blue Sky Entertainment, Inc. v. Town of GardinerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1989
- Long Island Lighting Co. v. CuomoDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1987
- County of Suffolk v. Long Island Lighting Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.