Legal Opinion

Michael Hood v. City of Tustin; Alex Cowdell; Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc.; Tricia Damian; Jesse Sanchez; and Does 1–20, inclusive

District Court, C.D. California

Decided May 19, 2026No. 8:26-cv-00435Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SOUTHERN DIVISION 11 12 M ICHAEL HOOD, an individual, Case No.: 8:26-cv-00435-JVS-JDE Plaintiff, 13 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 14 v. 15 C co I r T p Y or O at F io T n; U T S U T S IN TI , N a C PO al L if I o C rn E i a municipal DEPARTMENT, a department of the City of 16 Tustin; ALEX COWDELL, and individual; DICK’S SPORTING GOODS, INC., a 17 Delaware corporation; TRICIA DAMIAN, and individual; JESSE SANCHEZ, an 18 individual; and DOES 1–20, inclusive, 19 Defendants. 20 21 Based on the parties’ Stipulation…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'NCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Makar-Wellbon v. Sony Electronics, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1999
  3. Harmon Anderson v. City of Bristol, TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  4. State of Maine v. Sean EoriSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API