Legal Opinion

Commissioner v. Banks

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 24, 2005No. 03-892PublishedCited by 120 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kennedy

The question in these consolidated cases is whether the portion of a money judgment or settlement paid to a plaintiff’s attorney under a contingent-fee agreement is income to the plaintiff under the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U. S. C. § 1 et seq. (2000 ed. and Supp. I). The issue divides the courts of appeals. In one of the instant cases, Banks v. Commissioner, 345 F. 3d 373 (2003), the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held the contingent-fee portion of a litigation recovery is not included in the plaintiff’s gross income. The Courts of Appeals for the Fifth and Eleventh Circuits also…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Helvering v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. Manning v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. Chuong Van Pham v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Chuong Van Pham v. Seattle City LightWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Speltz v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2005
  5. Green v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API