Commissioner v. Banks
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kennedy
The question in these consolidated cases is whether the portion of a money judgment or settlement paid to a plaintiff’s attorney under a contingent-fee agreement is income to the plaintiff under the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U. S. C. § 1 et seq. (2000 ed. and Supp. I). The issue divides the courts of appeals. In one of the instant cases, Banks v. Commissioner, 345 F. 3d 373 (2003), the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held the contingent-fee portion of a litigation recovery is not included in the plaintiff’s gross income. The Courts of Appeals for the Fifth and Eleventh Circuits also…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Helvering v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by120 opinions
- Manning v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Chuong Van Pham v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Chuong Van Pham v. Seattle City LightWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Speltz v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2005
- Green v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.