Legal Opinion

Imlay v. California Cab Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 3, 1932No. Docket No. 7273PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAPPAAN, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment awarding plaintiff damages for personal injuries suffered by her while alighting from a taxicab owned and operated by defendant, and driven, at the time of the accident, by an employee of defendant and appellant.

Appellant’s first assignment of error is that both the trial court and plaintiff’s counsel, during the argument to the jury, were guilty of misconduct highly prejudicial to appellant and which prevented him from having a fair trial.

Prom an examination of the record presented upon this appeal it is extremely doubtful whether or not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Scott v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Hale v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Olsen v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  4. In Re WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Bisinger v. Sacramento Lodge No. 6California Supreme Court · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Oakland Scavenger Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  2. People v. GonzalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Wills v. JJ Newberry Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Pandolfo v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. People v. GonzalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API