Legal Opinion

IBM Corporation v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 25, 2014No. 14-864CPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Post-Award Bid Protest; Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record; Failure to Conform to Material Requirements of the Solicitation; FAR Part 8 Versus FAR Part 15; FAR 1.102-2; Fair and Impartial Treatment; Organizational Conflict of Interest

OPINION AND ORDER *

KAPLAN, Judge.

Plaintiff IBM Corporation. (“IBM”) is the incumbent contractor providing audit readiness services for the Depaximent of the Army (“the Army” or “the agency”) in support of the Army’s effort to produce audita-ble financial statements by September 2017. In this post-award bid protest, IBM challenges the Army’s "award…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  4. Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  5. Advanced Data Concepts, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Prescient, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  2. Dyncorp International, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  3. Monterey Consultants, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  4. Novak Birch, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  5. 22nd Century Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API