Legal Opinion
Edward W. Schroeder, Claimant-Appellant v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 18, 2000No. 99-7103PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
Edward W. Schroeder appeals the February 8 and February 11, 1999 decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (the CAVC), 1 No. 97-0131, denying his request for en banc review of his claim for direct service connection for bilateral eye disorder and affirming the Board of Veterans’ Appeals’ (the Board’s) determination that that claim was not well grounded. As part of his appeal to the CAVC, Schroeder successfully argued that his claim for service connection for bilateral eye disorder due to Agent Orange exposure was well grounded, and that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Vas-Cath Incorporated and Gambro, Inc. v. Sakharam D. Mahurkar, and Quinton Instruments CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- 3D Systems, Inc. v. Aarotech Laboratories, Inc., Aaroflex, Inc. And Albert C. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Lyle H. Prenzler v. Edward J. Derwinski, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Garrett v. Hayre, Claimant-Appellant v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Durden v. ColvinDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Robinson v. MansfieldUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2008
- Timberlake v. GoberUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2000
- Cullens v. GoberUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2001
- Arthur D. Roebuck v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.