Hazel v. McGrath
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBurke, P. J.
Plaintiff filed an action alleging negligence and seeking damages for personal injuries sustained in a rear end type automobile collision. The case was submitted to the jury on the issues of negligence, proximate cause, contributory negligence and damages. The jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant.
The specific injury for which plaintiff seeks damages is the detachment of the retina which caused blindness in his left *20eye. Prior to this automobile accident, plaintiff had four unnatural conditions of the left eye: refractive error, presbyopia (loss of focusing power which occurs with old…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Estate of TeedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Davenport v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Fewel & Dawes, Inc. v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Gottsdanker v. Cutter LaboratoriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Kroplin v. HustonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cooper v. Mart AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964