Legal Opinion

Hazel v. McGrath

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 17, 1963No. Civ. No. 26118PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, P. J.

Plaintiff filed an action alleging negligence and seeking damages for personal injuries sustained in a rear end type automobile collision. The case was submitted to the jury on the issues of negligence, proximate cause, contributory negligence and damages. The jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant.

The specific injury for which plaintiff seeks damages is the detachment of the retina which caused blindness in his left *20eye. Prior to this automobile accident, plaintiff had four unnatural conditions of the left eye: refractive error, presbyopia (loss of focusing power which occurs with old…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Estate of TeedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Davenport v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Fewel & Dawes, Inc. v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Gottsdanker v. Cutter LaboratoriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Kroplin v. HustonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cooper v. Mart AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API