Legal Opinion

Schlacter v. Harbin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1935No. Docket No. 115, Calendar No. 38,562PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Plaintiff, a guest in a Ford roadster owned and driven by defendant, rode with two other passengers from Flint to Pontiac. After spending the evening there, they prepared to return to Flint between 1:30 and 2:00 a. m., on October 1, 1933. On going to defendant’s car, plaintiff found it occu pied by six people, defendant and three others on the front seat of the roadster and two more on the ramble seat in the rear. Thus deprived of. a return passage, plaintiff first succeeded in getting aboard a milk truck, but later accepted defendant’s invitation to ride on the running board of his car.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bobich v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Finkler v. ZimmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Oxenger v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Grabowski v. SeylerMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Wyma v. Van AnrooyMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  2. Titus v. LonerganMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Mitchell v. WaltersWyoming Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Peyton v. DelnayMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Wieczorek v. MerskinMichigan Supreme Court · 1944

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API