Legal Opinion

Tichman v. Rubin

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided January 29, 1932No. 15732Published

1Opinion of the Court

Alessandroni, J.,

— -The plaintiff replevied various articles which had been distrained for rent due on premises No. 5100 Stenton Avenue. An affidavit of defense and counterclaim was filed in which the defendants deny wrongful possession of the plaintiff’s goods and chattels, and in the counterclaim it is set forth that the plaintiff leased the premises located at No. 5100 Stenton Avenue, Philadelphia, for a rental of $80 per month, for a term of three years, said lease being signed by the defendant, Nathan Rubin, as lessor. It is averred that the monthly rental of $80 became due in advance on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Howard v. MurphySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1854
  2. Gassner v. Pierce LlewellynSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API