Legal Opinion

Gassner v. Pierce Llewellyn

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 7, 1925No. Appeal 305PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

This was an action of replevin brought by a tenant for goods taken by lessor and his bailiff in distress for rent. Pierce, by written lease, demised a dwelling house and lot to plaintiff, at a rental of $125 a month, and plaintiff entered under that lease. After paying his lessor for some months the rent reserved, he declined to continue paying it to him, but, instead, paid it to the lessor’s wife, husband and wife having estates by entireties in the premises. The lessor then dis-trained for rent in arrear. The tenant brought replevin, filed a bond and received the goods.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. O'Malley v. O'MalleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Hamilton v. PittockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. Seyfert v. BeanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
  4. Bedford v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
  5. Farmers Deposit National Bank v. Western Pennsylvania Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rizzio v. Passalacqua, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1948
  2. Tichman v. Rubin, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API