Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dicie Ellen Hibley Swayze, Legal Guardian and Next Friend of Michael Wayne Swayze v. McNeil Laboratories, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 6, 1987No. 85-4894Published

1DissentGoldberg, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent. My brethren view too narrowly the scope of the duty imposed on McNeil to provide “adequate warnings” with inherently unsafe prescription drugs. Settled law holds McNeil liable for the harm the drugs actually and proximately cause if no “learned intermediary” intervenes or if McNeil knows that the drugs will be utilized in a widespread practice of illegal and dangerous medical activity. McNeil cannot immunize itself from liability simply by providing “adequately” written warnings that as a practical matter will not effect prophylaxis. Rather, such drugs with…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Clarence Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Nationalsurety Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  3. Alm v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Incollingo v. EWINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API