Legal Opinion

Irzo v. Perkins

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 14, 1881PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Admiralty.

1Opinion of the Court

Beown, D. J.

This is a libel in personam to recover damages in the nature of demurrage for the detention of the bark Eoma in the delivery of 300 tons of iron consigned to the respondents at this port.

The iron was shipped at Marseilles, under the usual hill of lading, to he delivered to the respondents on payment of freight, with no special clause in reference to demurrage or mode of delivery. The cargo of the Roma was a mixed cargo, consigned to six different consignees. The portion consigned to the respondents was in the bottom of the hold. It was the greatest in weight, but not in hulk, of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. The EddySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Ostrander v. Brown & StaffordNew York Supreme Court · 1818
  3. Brittan v. BarnabySupreme Court of the United States · 1859
  4. The GraftonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1846
  5. Kennedy v. DodgeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1867

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Union Pac. R. v. American Smelting & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  2. Middle Atlantic Conference v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1972
  3. Brooks v. Hilton-Dodge Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
  4. Brooks v. Hilton-Dodge Lumber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API