Legal Opinion

In re the Personal Restraint of Swenson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 6, 2010No. 63565-4-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchindler, J.

¶1 Steven D. Swenson filed a personal restraint petition (PRP) for resentencing before a different judge on his convictions of two counts of rape of a child in the first degree, two counts of communication with a minor for immoral purposes, and one count of sexual exploitation of a minor. While Swenson concedes he did not ask the judge to recuse, he claims the appearance of fairness doctrine, the Code of Judicial Conduct (CJC) Canon 3(D)(1), and his due process rights were violated because the sentencing judge was one of the prosecutors involved in an unrelated juvenile adjudication…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State of Washington v. Daniel BlizzardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  2. Personal Restraint Petition Of George P WoodardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. State of Washington v. Jeffery Allan EhartCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API