Memory Integrity, LLC v. Intel Corp.
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
Michael H. Simon, District Judge
In 2005, two sophisticated companies— Intel Corporation (“Intel”) and Sanmina-SCI Corporation (“Sanmina”) — entered into an agreement in which Intel agreed to disclose to Sanmina highly confidential information that Sanmina requested as part of its attempt to develop potentially lucrative technology that would be compatible with Intel products. In return for this information, Sanmina- agreed never to sue Intel for patent infringement based on any of Intel’s products that included any of the disclosed technologies. During Sanmina’s development…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gomez v. MaddenDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020