Legal Opinion

Memory Integrity, LLC v. Intel Corp.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided April 12, 2016No. Case No. 3:15-cv-00262-SIPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

Michael H. Simon, District Judge

In 2005, two sophisticated companies— Intel Corporation (“Intel”) and Sanmina-SCI Corporation (“Sanmina”) — entered into an agreement in which Intel agreed to disclose to Sanmina highly confidential information that Sanmina requested as part of its attempt to develop potentially lucrative technology that would be compatible with Intel products. In return for this information, Sanmina- agreed never to sue Intel for patent infringement based on any of Intel’s products that included any of the disclosed technologies. During Sanmina’s development…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gomez v. MaddenDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API