Legal Opinion

Jake's Ltd., Inc. v. City of Coates

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 13, 2001No. CIV. 00-192 (DWF/AJB)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

FRANK, District Judge.

1. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Amended Findings

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Amended Findings is based on Plaintiffs’ argument that Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. lc is unconstitutional. Minn.Stat. § 462.357, subd. lc states that:

Except as otherwise provided in this subdivision, a municipality must not enact, amend, or enforce an ordinance providing for the elimination or termination of a use by amortization which use was lawful at the time of its inception. This subdivision does not apply to adults-only bookstores, adults-only theaters, or similar adults-only businesses as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
City of Erie v. Pap's A. M.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
Reserve Mining Company v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
Ambassador Books & Video, Inc. Allan Dunlap, Doing Business as United Arcade v. City of Little Rock, ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
N.W. Enterprises, Inc. v. City of HoustonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

Jake's, Ltd., Inc. Richard J. Jacobson v. City of CoatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
Jake's, Ltd., Inc. v. City of CoatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002