Legal Opinion

Figueroa v. BNSF Railway Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 2017No. CC 15CV13390; SC S063929PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*144KISTLER, J.

Oregon requires that foreign corporations doing business in this state appoint a registered agent to receive service of process. ORS 60.731CL).1 The primary question that this case presents is whether, by appointing a registered agent in Oregon, defendant (a foreign corporation) impliedly consented to general jurisdiction here—that is, whether defendant consented to have Oregon courts adjudicate any and all claims against it regardless of whether those claims have any connection to defendant’s activities in this state.2 Defendant moved to dismiss this action because the trial court…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Chavez v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. KeysOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Health Net, Inc. v. Dep't of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Shriners Hosps. for Children v. CoxOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Karl Langlois v. Bnsf Railway, CoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API