Legal Opinion

Chavez v. State

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 2019No. CC 111114537 (SC S064968)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Id. at 306, 109 S.Ct. 1060 (quoting Mackey , 401 U.S. at 682-83, 91 S.Ct. 1160 (Harlan, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part)). After noting the different considerations at issue in cases arising on direct appeal and in cases arising on collateral review, Teague concluded that, as a general rule, new federal constitutional rules will not apply retroactively to cases that had become **667final before the new constitutional rule was announced. Id. at 307-08, 109 S.Ct. 1060. Teague also recognized two exceptions to that "general rule of nonretroactivity": (1) "if [the rule] places…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Montgomery v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Desist v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Watkins v. AckleyOregon Supreme Court · 2022
  2. White v. PremoOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Ingle v. MatteucciOregon Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Peeler v. ReyesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  5. State v. KeysOregon Supreme Court · 2021

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API