Legal Opinion

State v. McCullough

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 30, 2026No. 127008Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 127,008 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. VERLEE MCCULLOUGH III, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. When considering a defendant's motion to suppress, an appellate court reviews the district court's factual findings for substantial competent evidence; the district court's legal conclusions are reviewed de novo. 2. The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires any statements stemming from a custodial interview to be excluded unless the State proves that procedural safeguards, i.e., Miranda warnings, were used to secure the waiver of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  2. State v. BridgesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  3. State v. WARRIORSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  4. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  5. State v. TalkingtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API