Legal Opinion

Wimbley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 19, 2014No. CR-11-0076PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Corey Allen Wimbley was indicted for one count of murder made capital pursuant to § 13A-5-40(a)(2), Ala.Code 1975, for killing Connie Ray Wheat during the course of a robbery and one count of murder made capital pursuant to § 13A-5-40(a)(9), Ala.Code 1975, for killing Wheat during the course of an arson.

At the conclusion of the guilt phase of the trial, the jury unanimously found Wim-bley guilty of both counts, and, following the presentation of evidence during the penalty phase of the trial, it recommended by a vote of 11-1 that he be sentenced to death for count one and by a vote of 10-2…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited238 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

233 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lam Luong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2016
  2. Bohannon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2015
  3. Largin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2015
  4. Towles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2018
  5. Towles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API