Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jenkins v. Stephens

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1924No. 4089Published

1DissentFrick, J.

I regret that I am unable to concur with my associates in the conclusions reached by them. As a general proposition dissenting opinions may be said to be stillborn, and hence fruitless. In important cases, however, they afford the dissenting member an opportunity of expressing his views respecting the questions involved and to give his reasons why, in his judgment, the conclusions of the majority should not prevail. Ordinarily I deem it my duty to yield to the judgment of my associates. There are, however, instances where to do that involves more than a mere reconciliation of conflicting…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Everett v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Dow v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Jensen v. LichtensteinUtah Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Mullally v. Irish-American Benevolent SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Wall v. HealdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API