Legal Opinion

Wigington v. State

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided August 12, 2015No. Appellate Case No. 2011-193670; No. 5340Published

1Opinion of the Court

LOCKEMY, Judge.

In this post-conviction relief (PCR) action, George Wiging-ton (Petitioner) argues the PCR court erred in finding trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to properly argue to the trial court and preserve for appellate review whether he was entitled to an involuntary manslaughter jury charge. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

FACTS/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In August 2005, Petitioner was indicted by a Spartanburg County grand jury for murder and possession of a weapon during the commission of a violent crime.

At trial, Petitioner testified his son, his son’s girlfriend, and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cherry v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  3. State v. PittmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  4. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  5. State v. BurrissSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API