Legal Opinion
Conn v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided June 27, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeogdeN, J.
The record shows the following: During the argument of one of the counsel for plaintiff to the jury, he made the following statement:
“The law in North Carolina says that all Mr. Conn had to do when he approached the track was to stop, if the circumstances were such that an ordinarily prudent man would stop, look and listen, and then go ahead as he did in this case.” “The North Carolina Supreme Court in the case of Kimbrough v. R. R., 180 N. C., 274, and decided in the year 1920, turned the defendant’s theory down flat. I want to read here what Judge Ciarle said about the law. Judge Ciarle was…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- People v. . FieldingNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Scripps v. ReillyMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Williams v. . B.E.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
- State v. . TuckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- McLamb v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. AnthonySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- Carter v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Ehlers v. BarbeauMichigan Supreme Court · 1939