Legal Opinion
State v. Eckles
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 14, 2007No. 07 BE 12PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Vukovich, Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Rodney Eckles appeals from his conviction in the Belmont County Common Pleas Court for driving under the influence (“OVI”), a violation of R.C. 4511.19(A)(1)(h). The dispositive issue raised in this appeal is whether Eckles’s plea was entered into knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily. For the reasons stated below, we hold that it was not. Thus, the judgment of the trial court is reversed, the plea is vacated, and the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.
STATEMENT OF CASE
{¶ 2} On February 24, 2006, a bill of information was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. BallardOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. CaplingerOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. MagbyOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. MurrayOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- State v. PhillipsOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. OrtelloOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.