Vincitore v. New Jersey Sports & Exposition Authority
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
777 A.2d 9 (2001)
169 N.J. 119
Geraldine VINCITORE, Administratrix Ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Michael VINCITORE and Geraldine Vincitore, Individually, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
NEW JERSEY SPORTS AND EXPOSITION AUTHORITY, Defendant-Respondent, and
New Jersey Transit, Robert Stocker, John Doe, Richard Roe, ABC Corporation, and DEF Corporation, said names being fictitious, Defendants.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued January 30, 2001.
Decided July 19, 2001.
John M. Peduto, Asbury Park, argued the cause, for appellant.
John S. Fitzpatrick, New Providence, argued the cause, for respondent…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ayers v. Township of JacksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Nolan v. Lee HoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Willis v. Department of Conservation & Economic DevelopmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Jannarone v. WT Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Garrison v. Township of MiddletownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.