Legal Opinion

Vincitore v. New Jersey Sports & Exposition Authority

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 19, 2001Published

1Opinion of the Court

777 A.2d 9 (2001)

169 N.J. 119

Geraldine VINCITORE, Administratrix Ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Michael VINCITORE and Geraldine Vincitore, Individually, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

NEW JERSEY SPORTS AND EXPOSITION AUTHORITY, Defendant-Respondent, and

New Jersey Transit, Robert Stocker, John Doe, Richard Roe, ABC Corporation, and DEF Corporation, said names being fictitious, Defendants.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued January 30, 2001.

Decided July 19, 2001.

John M. Peduto, Asbury Park, argued the cause, for appellant.

John S. Fitzpatrick, New Providence, argued the cause, for respondent…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ayers v. Township of JacksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. Nolan v. Lee HoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  3. Willis v. Department of Conservation & Economic DevelopmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  4. Jannarone v. WT Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  5. Garrison v. Township of MiddletownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API