Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Di Paolo v. Passaic County Board of Chosen Freeholders

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 1, 2000PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Collester’s opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 322 N.J.Super. 487, 731 A.2d 519 (1999).

For affirmance — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices O’HERN, STEIN, COLEMAN, LONG, VERNIERO and LaVECCHIA — 7.

Opposed — None.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. DiPaolo v. PASSAIC BD. FREEHOLDERSNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Golden v. County of UnionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
  2. Merlino v. Borough of Midland ParkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  3. Miskowitz v. Union County Utilities AuthorityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
  4. Golden v. County of UnionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
  5. Merlino v. Borough of Midland ParkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API