Legal Opinion

Schmid v. Roehm GmbH

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided July 21, 1982No. Civ. A. 80-2159PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

O’CONNOR, Chief Judge.

Now pending before the court are plaintiff’s motion to strike defenses of Liberty Organization, Inc. (hereafter Liberty), the motion of RG Industries, Inc. (hereafter RG), for summary judgment, the motion of Roehm GmbH (hereafter Roehm) to dismiss, and plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment. Defendant RG’s previous motion to dismiss has been consumed by the motion for summary judgment and is therefore considered withdrawn.

Plaintiff’s motion to strike defenses raised in the answer of Liberty goes to the defenses of improper service, statute of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Zubik v. ZubikCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
  5. Fish v. EastCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. United Telecommunications, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1983
  2. Dean Operations, Inc. v. One Seventy AssociatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  3. Doughty v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  4. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. v. Coleman Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
  5. Wandrey v. Service Business Forms, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API