Legal Opinion

City of Springfield v. Mecum

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 2, 1959No. 7765PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDowell, judge.

This appeal comes here by transfer from the Supreme Court because of lack of jurisdiction of that court to hear and determine such cause.

The appellants were found guilty by the trial court in Greene County, Missouri, and fined $10 each for violation of City Ordinance No. 1148, § 4(b) forbidding use of outboard motors in excess of six horsepower on Lake Springfield, property of the City.

We adopt the facts found by the trial court in his memorandum which are as follows :

“The City of Springfield, which owns and operates its own electrical system, recently constructed a large…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tietjens v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  2. State Ex Rel. State Game Commission v. Red River Valley Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
  3. City of Springfield v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  4. Ex Parte WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  5. Elder v. DelcourSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Marshall v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  2. Easy Living Mobile Manor, Inc. v. Eureka Fire Protection DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. City of Odessa v. BorgicMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. City of Lake Lotawana v. MeagherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Marshall v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API