Legal Opinion
Miller v. Ford Motor Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 25, 2007No. A07A1498PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bernes, Judge.
Dean and Sue Miller brought this tort action against Ford Motor Company and James Ernest Banks following an automobile collision. The Millers alleged that Ford negligently manufactured and assembled the seat belt and side air bag on the front passenger side of their Lincoln Town Car and failed to warn them of these defects. The trial court granted summary judgment to Ford on the ground that the Millers had. failed to present any evidence that the seat belt and side air bag contained a manufacturing defect. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm.
1. The Millers contend that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Millar Elevator Service Co. v. O'SHIELDSCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Rose v. Figgie International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Henderson v. Hercules, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Brookview Holdings, LLC v. SuarezCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Home Depot U. S. A., Inc. v. Wabash National Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- In re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013
- R & R Insulation Services, Inc. v. Royal Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Henson v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Boswell v. Overhead Door Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.