Legal Opinion
Commercial Union Insurance v. Cannelton Industries, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided March 28, 1994No. 2:92-CV-111PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
QUIST, District Judge.
Commercial Union filed an Amended Complaint for Declaratory Relief on November 18, 1993, in which it named approximately fifty of Cannelton’s insurers as additional defendants with Cannelton. Cannelton responded by filing motions to (1) realign and drop parties, (2) dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, (3) dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, or (4) stay the proceedings. Commercial Union agrees that the parties should be realigned, but it proposes an alignment with Cannelton as plaintiff. Commercial Union opposes all the other motions.
Commercial…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-LarrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Indianapolis v. Chase Nat. BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- City of Indianapolis v. Chase National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Field v. Volkswagenwerk AGCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- South Dakota Ex Rel. South Dakota Railroad Authority v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2003
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
- Zenith Electronics Corp. v. Kimball International Manufacturing, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
- Auctus Fund, LLC v. Drone Guarder, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022
- Avisar v. ChenDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024