Legal Opinion

Dime Savings Bank v. Tomashoff

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1963Published

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph Liff, J.

This is a motion for an order confirming the

report of the Referee to compute. The defendant united states of America raises an objection to the form of the judgment in that it fails to give priority to Federal tax liens. The plaintiff, in its complaint, alleged that a conveyance by the defendant EDWIN TOMASHOFF to ETHE BRAUNSTEIN and BERNARD BRAUNSTEIN, of “ all of his one-half interest” in the premises was really meant to convey all of his interest therein, and the plaintiff asks that the judgment so provide.

Since the first of the Federal tax liens in question was filed against edwin…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McClelland v. Climax Hosiery MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Fleischmann v. . SternNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Trapani v. Vista Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Ward v. Davega City Radio, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API