Morris v. BNSF Railway Company
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 JAROD MORRIS, CASE NO. 3:23-cv-05059-DGE 11 Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTION FOR 12 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DKT. NO. 61) AND MOTION TO 13 BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, EXCLUDE (DKT. NO. 63) 14 Defendant. 15 16 I INTRODUCTION 17 This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 18 No. 61) and Defendant’s motion to exclude Plaintiff’s experts (Dkt. No. 63). For the foregoing 19 reasons, the motion for summary judgement is DENIED. The motion to exclude is GRANTED 20 IN PART and DENIED IN…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.